SUBNET TRACKER · All subnets
SN102 · ConnitoAI
Every Bittensor Daily mention of SN102 ConnitoAI, newest first. Price changes are snapshots from each edition.
24h change −2.80%
- What happened
- Community members questioned the consistent top ranking of a miner operating under the name sharp0203 (publicly linked to an identity called putty), arguing that reproducing the model's results did not match the reported scores. A community member said running the public model with the same validation seeds used on SN102 (ConnitoAI) produced different results. Separately, a message referenced a reported SN92 (alpha) transfer to the same miner's coldkey from an owner wallet, which some read as a sign of special treatment. The team, through its community manager, opened an investigation into the reproducibility claim and the validator scoring.
- Community
- Multiple members pressed for the miner's identity and an explanation, some calling the pattern of consistent first-place finishes suspicious. Other members pushed back, defending the miner's standing and the alpha transfer as unrelated to unfair treatment, while one self-identified alpha holder asked the channel to stay technical rather than emotional.
- Official
- The community manager asked the member who reproduced different results to share cycles, seeds, commands and outputs so the team could attempt to reproduce the discrepancy, and pointed to public code and a public validator dashboard. The team relayed the miner's own explanation that his lead comes from incremental gains on an 8×H200 setup, and later clarified that two disputed validator scores came from different rounds and were not directly comparable.
24h change −4.87%
- What happened
- SN102 (ConnitoAI) released v0.7.0, switching the active task to exp_pmc_residual (group 9, Qwen3.6 with residual experts) starting at cycle 17728 and requiring a new shard format. Validator instability tied to an unreachable OpenTensor archive node caused top-3 weights not to be saved for cycles 17722 and 17724. The cycle 17728 task-group transition additionally led to confusion over miner rankings appearing reset to fixed UIDs with equal weight. A new incentive mechanism was teased ahead of an October 30 launch.
- Community
- Miners asked about minimum GPU requirements for mining and were told a single L40S or A6000-class GPU is sufficient. Several participants debated whether the validator's behavior reflected a genuine reset of incentivized miner UIDs or was a side effect of the task-group switch, with one miner tracking the same three fixed UIDs receiving equal 0.25 weight across multiple cycles. Others asked for details on the upcoming incentive mechanism ahead of its October 30 launch.
- Official
- The team confirmed the missing top-3 weights for cycles 17722 and 17724 were linked to validator instability from an unreachable OpenTensor archive node, and later explained that a v0.7.0 update, a chain RPC-triggered restart, and the group 9 task switch overlapped at cycle 17728, clarifying that the equal 0.25 weights were not a genuine state reset.